This commit fixes a database error in the `ingest_references_backgrou…
Created by: Edouard-Legoupil
…ndfunction inbackend/api/knowledge.py`.
The function was attempting to fetch references using a knowledge_card_id column on the knowledge_card_references table, which does not exist. This caused a sqlalchemy.exc.DatabaseError because of the incorrect column name.
The SQL query has been corrected to properly join knowledge_card_references with the knowledge_card_to_references table to retrieve the correct references based on the knowledge_card_id. This resolves the traceback and allows the background ingestion task to function as intended.
- Does my code meet the quality standards for releasing packages?
- Does the reviewer have all the information to validate the features/issues without too much research?
- Does the customer who will validate the associated tickets have the information to do so without wasting time?
Issues to validate to close :
-
issue #
Processed issues to keep open or in progress:
-
issue #
Checklist:
-
Does the package check go local? -
Does the CI pass? -
Are the added / fixed features documented, tested? -
Are the added features / solved problems briefly presented in the PR message? -
Are the changes related to tickets / issues that I have listed in the commits and in the PR itself? -
Are the tickets in "review" mode in the Project Tracking Board? -
Does each ticket, if it is to be closed after acceptance of the PR, contain a comment that tells how to validate it?