Call out that no explicit path structured is required for `did` based identifiers in the IDR page.

Impacted Sections

List UNTP specification page(s) that are impacted by this issue. For example:

• https://spec-untp-fbb45f.opensource.unicc.org/docs/specification/IdentityResolver

Issue Description

There are example did's provided in the page, such as did:web:sample-company.example:products:123456789, and for readers this could be suggestive that a path of :products:<PRODUCT_ID> is required.

This is not the case, and should explicitly be called out.

I Have

• Added the relevant labels (e.g. WG-Adoption, WG-Conformity, WG-SupplyChain, WG-Technical, WG-Steering, etc.).